<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decidedly Short Blog Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/09/07/the-decidedly-short-blog-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/09/07/the-decidedly-short-blog-post/</link>
	<description>Floccinaucinihilipilificating antidisestablishmentarianism since 2001.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/09/07/the-decidedly-short-blog-post/#comment-5265</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=919#comment-5265</guid>
		<description>I would like to see scientists talking earnestly about the Woefully Obsolete Radio Telescope or the Frankly Embarrassing Hadron Collider. (This latter being even more of a typo minefield than the LHC.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see scientists talking earnestly about the Woefully Obsolete Radio Telescope or the Frankly Embarrassing Hadron Collider. (This latter being even more of a typo minefield than the LHC.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/09/07/the-decidedly-short-blog-post/#comment-5231</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=919#comment-5231</guid>
		<description>2. That's a worrying point. Maybe science could be saved by downgrading the appellations of pre-existing big things when there are even bigger ones.
You could have the Average-size Hadron Collider, or the Not-big-or-clever-Telescope. The swear-words would only have to get used when the Insigificant Hadron Collider needed renaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2. That&#8217;s a worrying point. Maybe science could be saved by downgrading the appellations of pre-existing big things when there are even bigger ones.<br />
You could have the Average-size Hadron Collider, or the Not-big-or-clever-Telescope. The swear-words would only have to get used when the Insigificant Hadron Collider needed renaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
