<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Briffa&#8217;s Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/</link>
	<description>Floccinaucinihilipilificating antidisestablishmentarianism since 2001.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr John Briffa on testing for food sensitivity: applied kinesiology, dowsing and IgG tests &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr John Briffa on testing for food sensitivity: applied kinesiology, dowsing and IgG tests &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>[...] recently I had rather agreed with him. However, Briffa has now taken up some worrying positions on vaccines and autism. Along with Dr Crippen, &#8220;I am worried about Dr John [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently I had rather agreed with him. However, Briffa has now taken up some worrying positions on vaccines and autism. Along with Dr Crippen, &#8220;I am worried about Dr John [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apathy Sketchpad &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oh, Briffa</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Apathy Sketchpad &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oh, Briffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve explained often enough already that nobody is doing this. (His response seems to be to find something I&#8217;ve said which, if cunningly misinterpreted and then fed through several steps....) His basic accusation is that we say the evidence says something it doesn&#8217;t, but the fact of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve explained often enough already that nobody is doing this. (His response seems to be to find something I&#8217;ve said which, if cunningly misinterpreted and then fed through several steps&#8230;.) His basic accusation is that we say the evidence says something it doesn&#8217;t, but the fact of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if you &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; implement that new Captcha, do share the code with me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if you <i>do</i> implement that new Captcha, do share the code with me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>No offense was intended, Bill. I sincerely apologise.

I could make fun of Briffa's last name, but that's more akin to his level of "debate", where he pulls apart the semantics of an argument rather than addressing the actual point actually raised by the person actually making a statement. Actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense was intended, Bill. I sincerely apologise.</p>
<p>I could make fun of Briffa&#8217;s last name, but that&#8217;s more akin to his level of &#8220;debate&#8221;, where he pulls apart the semantics of an argument rather than addressing the actual point actually raised by the person actually making a statement. Actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>Demeaning questions, eh? I think Andrew's trying to rile Dr Briffa. He won't like that one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demeaning questions, eh? I think Andrew&#8217;s trying to rile Dr Briffa. He won&#8217;t like that one bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>Ben,
I'm thinking of editing my captcha code so that a predefined list of IP addresses see new, more demeaning questions. The idea of Dr Briffa sitting there answering questions like "what letter does 'ball' begin with?" would amuse me immensely in a very immature way.

Dr Briffa,
If plh is one of my friends, I've yet to figure out which one. Perhaps you are mentally classifying anyone who agrees with you as "independent" and everyone else as my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,<br />
I&#8217;m thinking of editing my captcha code so that a predefined list of IP addresses see new, more demeaning questions. The idea of Dr Briffa sitting there answering questions like &#8220;what letter does &#8216;ball&#8217; begin with?&#8221; would amuse me immensely in a very immature way.</p>
<p>Dr Briffa,<br />
If plh is one of my friends, I&#8217;ve yet to figure out which one. Perhaps you are mentally classifying anyone who agrees with you as &#8220;independent&#8221; and everyone else as my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>Ben.

What have you got against me? Confusing me with Dr. Briffa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben.</p>
<p>What have you got against me? Confusing me with Dr. Briffa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>Thats a logical fallacy, Dr.B.

The fact that it cannot be proved that MMR does not cause autism, does not mean that it does. The truth of a specific claim depends on the evidence for that claim.

There is no evidence other than anecdote, which suffers from the"Post hoc, ergo propter hoc " fallacy. Correlation is not causation.

But you know all this and for reasons of your own, prefer to ignore it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a logical fallacy, Dr.B.</p>
<p>The fact that it cannot be proved that MMR does not cause autism, does not mean that it does. The truth of a specific claim depends on the evidence for that claim.</p>
<p>There is no evidence other than anecdote, which suffers from the&#8221;Post hoc, ergo propter hoc &#8221; fallacy. Correlation is not causation.</p>
<p>But you know all this and for reasons of your own, prefer to ignore it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>I meant John Briffa, obviously. I don't know, though. Bill seems more fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant John Briffa, obviously. I don&#8217;t know, though. Bill seems more fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>Oh, this is delicious. Truly nectarous. Bill "I'm a Doctor, Not a Debater!" Briffa is getting into an online argument and is, for want of a better word, &lt;em&gt;trolling&lt;/em&gt; Andrew and deliberately dodging his argument. He's not giving a proper response to his questions and is instead arguing semantics!

I think I'll call for the waiter and cancel dessert. I don't think I could possibly eat another bite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, this is delicious. Truly nectarous. Bill &#8220;I&#8217;m a Doctor, Not a Debater!&#8221; Briffa is getting into an online argument and is, for want of a better word, <em>trolling</em> Andrew and deliberately dodging his argument. He&#8217;s not giving a proper response to his questions and is instead arguing semantics!</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll call for the waiter and cancel dessert. I don&#8217;t think I could possibly eat another bite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plh</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3276</link>
		<dc:creator>plh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3276</guid>
		<description>Note also that the substantive evidence of absence (aka absence of evidence in many cases), even if - and this is a crucially important point - it was not considered so implausible a hypothesis in the first place, is very far from powerless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note also that the substantive evidence of absence (aka absence of evidence in many cases), even if - and this is a crucially important point - it was not considered so implausible a hypothesis in the first place, is very far from powerless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plh</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>plh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>(a prima facie implausible or unlikely hypothesis, e.g. it is the tooth fairy who places a coin under your pillow when you lose a tooth, is a hypothesis which can, of course, be investigated. The more evidence that accumulates consistent with the null hypothesis - that there is no such thing as the tooth fairy and it was in fact your mum wot dunnit - the less credence one gives to the initially implausible hypothesis)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(a prima facie implausible or unlikely hypothesis, e.g. it is the tooth fairy who places a coin under your pillow when you lose a tooth, is a hypothesis which can, of course, be investigated. The more evidence that accumulates consistent with the null hypothesis - that there is no such thing as the tooth fairy and it was in fact your mum wot dunnit - the less credence one gives to the initially implausible hypothesis)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plh</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator>plh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3274</guid>
		<description>"...does absence of evidence mean evidence of absence to you?" -- Dr Briffa

So my quoting from a book on the elementary logic of statistical reasoning was in vain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;does absence of evidence mean evidence of absence to you?&#8221; &#8212; Dr Briffa</p>
<p>So my quoting from a book on the elementary logic of statistical reasoning was in vain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Briffa</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>John Briffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>Bill
You seem to have attempted to side-step my question: does absence of evidence mean evidence of absence to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill<br />
You seem to have attempted to side-step my question: does absence of evidence mean evidence of absence to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plh</title>
		<link>http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/2008/05/30/a-briffas-wrong/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>plh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apathysketchpad.com/blog/?p=844#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>If you aim any lower, Dr Briffa, you'll break your knuckles on Andrew's boots and that Cochrane review will still be standing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you aim any lower, Dr Briffa, you&#8217;ll break your knuckles on Andrew&#8217;s boots and that Cochrane review will still be standing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
